【顶级期刊创业研究速递】JBV 2019年3月中英文摘要（上）
Increasing quantity without compromising quality How managerial framing affects intrapreneurship
在不影响质量的情况下增加数量：管理框架如何影响内部创业
作者：
J.P.C. (Coen) Rigtering ,a, G.U. (Utz) Weitzela ,b, K. (Katrin) Muehlfeld ,a,c
a Utrecht University, Utrecht University School of Economics, P.O. Box 80125, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands
b Radboud University, Nijmegen School of Management, Institute for Management Research, P.O. Box 9108, 6525 GD Nijmegen, the Netherlands
c Trier University, Department of Business Administration, Chair of Management, Organization Studies, and HRM, P.O. Box 28, 54296 Trier, Germany
摘要：
个体水平的机会认知过程对于公司内部创业极为重要。但是对于管理沟通如何影响刺激个体参与内部创业创意建议系统的有效性仍然知之甚少。综合自我决策理论、创造力和框架研究，我们推导出邀请员工提交提案的不同方式（选择退出/选择加入注册;提供示例）会如何影响提交的提案的数量和质量。我们的多方法研究（实地实验，插图实验，访谈）表明：（i）选择退出可以在不降低创意质量的情况下提高员工参与度；（ii）提供示例可以增强创意的有用性，但会减少新颖性和提交的数量。
Individual-level opportunity recognition processes are vital to corporate entrepreneurship. However, little is known regarding how managerial communication impacts the effectiveness of idea suggestion systems in stimulating individuals' participation in intrapreneurial ideation. Integrating self-determination theory, creativity, and framing research, we theorize how different ways of inviting employees to submit proposals (opt-out/opt-in registration; provision of examples) affect the number and quality of submitted ideas. Our multi-method study (field experiment, vignette experiment, interviews) shows that (i) opt-out increases employee participation without reducing idea quality and (ii) the provision of examples enhances the usefulness of ideas but decreases novelty and the number of submissions.
Knocking at the gate The path to publication for entrepreneurship experiments through the lens of gatekeeping theory
敲开那扇门：通过守门人理论视角看到创业学实验法研究的发表之路
作者：
Regan M. Stevenson, Matthew Josefy
Department of Management & Entrepreneurship, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, 1309 E 10th St., Bloomington 47405, IN, USA
摘要：
本文基于守门人理论探索创业实验主义者在评审过程中收到的个人与常规性批评。使用多案例研究，我们对常见的守门主题进行了分类，并展示了基于独特决策信函样本和对创业学编辑补充调查的说明性批评。结合起来，本文通过思考如何将守门人理论应用于学术领域来拓展它，为创业学实验在评审阶段不通过提供一个额外的解释性框架，最终给实验研究的学者和审稿人提供情境性的建议。
We draw on gatekeeping theory to explore the individual and routine-level criticisms that entrepreneurship experimentalists receive during the review process. Using a multi-study approach, we categorize common gatekeeping themes and present illustrative critiques derived from a unique sample of decision letters and a supplemental survey of entrepreneurship editors. In combination, we extend gatekeeping theory by considering how it applies to the scholarly domain, contribute to the literature by exploring an alternative theoretical explanation as to why entrepreneurship experiments might fail to survive the review process, and finally, provide contextualized recommendations for authors and reviewers of experimental research
The effect of a tax training program on tax compliance and business outcomes of starting entrepreneurs Evidence from a field experiment
税务培训项目对于创业者的纳税合规与企业绩效的影响：来自田野实验的证据
作者：
Hanskje Nagela,b,*, Laura Rosendahl Huberc, Mirjam Van Praagd,e,f, Sjoerd Goslingaa,g
a Belastingdienst\Centrum voor kennis en communicatie, Herman Gorterstraat 75, Utrecht, postbus 18200, 3501 CE, the Netherlands
b University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands
c Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Marstallplatz 1, 80539 München, Germany
d Copenhagen Business School, Dept. of Innovation and Organizational Economics, Kilevej 14a, Frederiksberg 2000, Copenhagen, Denmark
e Tinbergen Institute, the Netherlands
f CEPR, United States of America
g Department of Social and Organisational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
摘要：
本文估计了一个短期、部分定制化和强制性的税务培训项目对于首次创业者的纳税合规和企业绩效的影响。为此，本文将荷兰税务和海关总署的调查数据，审计数据和独特的登记数据与一项为期三年的随机试验相结合。该结果表明，培训影响了税收合规行为的特定领域。而且，该项目对于企业生存没有任何影响，但是由于较低的企业成本实验组创业者相对于控制组创业者拥有更高的利润。这些结果部分支持了我们根据税收合规和心理账户理论提出的假设。
This paper estimates the long-term impact of a short, partly personalized, mandatory tax training program on tax compliance and business outcomes of first-time entrepreneurs. To this end, we combine survey data, audit data and unique register data from the Netherlands' Tax and Customs Administration with a three year long randomized experiment. The results show that the training affects specific domains of tax compliant behavior. Moreover, it has no impact on business survival, but treated entrepreneurs have significantly higher profits compared to the control group due to lower business costs. These outcomes are partially supportive of our hypotheses developed from theories on tax compliance and mental accounting.
Navigating the validity tradeoffs of entrepreneurship research experiments A systematic review and best-practice suggestions
创业学研究实验的有效性概览：系统回顾与最佳实践建议
作者：
Denis A. Grégoire ,a, Julia K. Binder ,b, Andreas Rauch ,c
a HEC Montréal, Department of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 3000, Chemin de la C e-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal (Québec), Canada H3T 2A7
b école Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), College of Management of Technology, Chair of Entrepreneurship and Technology Commercialization, Odyssea 3.17, Station 5, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
c The University of Sydney Business School, Rm 4231, Abercrombie Building, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
摘要：
实验方法为提高对创业的学术理解提供了重要优势。然而，一些创业关键特征之间复杂而混合的关系给创业研究者带来了棘手的方法论挑战——特别面临外部理想性与构念有效性的重要权衡。为促进创业研究中实验方法的迁移应用，本文概述了困扰创业研究实验的关键有效性挑战，并评估了使用这些方法在144项研究中的有效性验证实践。基于这些研究结果，本文制定了可操作的有效性策略的实用指南，以帮助实验者掌握上述权衡并进行现实的、具有理论上有意义的创业研究实验，并帮助确定其核心变量的因果效应。通过这样做，本文提供了一套实用的手段来支持实验方法迁移以推进创业研究。
Experimental methods provide important advantages for advancing academic understanding of entrepreneurship. Yet, the complex and comingled relationships between some of entrepreneurship's key characteristics pose thorny methodological challenges to entrepreneurship researchers – notably to negotiate important tradeoffs between the ideals of external and construct validity. To facilitate the sound mobilization of experimental methods in entrepreneurship research, we present an overview of critical validity challenges plaguing entrepreneurship research experiments and assess the validation practices mobilized in 144 studies using such methods. Building on these findings, we develop a practical guide of actionable validation strategies to help experimenters navigate the above tradeoffs and conduct entrepreneurship research experiments that are realistic, theoretically meaningful, and that help establish the causal effects of their focal variables. By doing so, we contribute a set of pragmatic means to support the mobilization of experimental methods for advancing entrepreneurship research.
END
作者：刘志阳，系上海财经大学商学院副院长、创业学院执行副院长、中国社会创业研究中心主任
本期我们分享了【顶级期刊创业研究速递】JBV 2019年3月中英文摘要（上） 。如果您感兴趣并想进一步了解，欢迎阅读《创业画布》。
点击“阅读原文”或扫描右侧二维码购买《创业画布》
文章荐读：
【顶级期刊创业研究速递】JBV 2019年1月文献中英文摘要（下）
【顶级期刊创业研究速递】JBV 2019年1月文献中英文摘要（上）
- 图文编辑：王陆峰 -
阅读更多精彩内容
长按扫码关注我们